Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) said on October 14, 2026, that enforcement of Pennsylvania's skill games ban has begun. The October 13 compliance date for businesses had passed, and so had the 120-day safe harbor the Pennsylvania Supreme Court set in its June 15, 2026 ruling. In a release dated October 14 from Harrisburg, PSP said unlicensed machines outside PGCB-licensed businesses are unlawful and can be seized immediately. The release announces that enforcement has started and lists what police may do. It does not report any seizures already carried out. As of October 15, no verified source had reported seizure counts, arrests or charges. On the day itself, NBC10 Philadelphia reported that police "plan to begin seizing" machines.
What PSP said
The PSP release states: "All 'skill games' devices/slot machines located outside of PGCB-licensed businesses are unlawful." It says establishments "possessing, operating and/or maintaining such machines" are "subject to criminal prosecution" and face immediate seizure as of October 14. According to PSP, enforcement "may include seizing and forfeiting the machines, associated equipment and proceeds," along with criminal charges where appropriate. It adds: "Only licensed casinos and qualifying licensed 'truck stop establishments' may legally possess and operate slot machines."
PSP's Skill Games Resources page says: "Powering off or unplugging an otherwise operable machine is not sufficient." Removal covers associated equipment such as ticket redemption terminals. Liquor-licensed businesses that do not comply can also receive administrative citations against their licenses. Pennsylvania Attorney General Dave Sunday made the same point in a September 29 release: "A slot machine does not cease being a slot machine if it has simply been turned off, unplugged, or temporarily disabled." That release also warned that distributors, vendors and manufacturers could face criminal charges.
The six operator agreements
PSP said six skill-game operators or distributors have signed agreements with it. It did not name them. Several more distributors have agreements pending and are asking for longer timelines. Under the agreements, operators must:
-
make devices inoperable starting October 14, 2026;
-
remove machines on a continuing rolling basis;
-
give PSP a full list of the machines they own and where each one is;
-
send PSP weekly removal updates; and
-
agree that machines not removed by PSP's deadline will be forfeited.
In return, PSP sets removal timelines in proportion to how much equipment each operator has, and holds off on seizures until those deadlines pass.
How Pennsylvania got here
On June 15, 2026, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided two consolidated cases: In re: Three Pennsylvania Skill Amusement Devices (No. 50 MAP 2024) and POM of Pennsylvania, LLC v. Department of Revenue (No. 2 EAP 2024). Both decisions reversed the Commonwealth Court. Saiber reports that Justice David Wecht wrote the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice Todd and Justice McCaffery. The majority called the lower court's reading "deeply flawed." KMGS Law reports that the court found the devices are slot machines "several times over." It held they fit the Gaming Act's 2017 definitions of a "skill slot machine" or "hybrid slot machine" and are subject to Crimes Code Section 5513.
The court gave a 120-day period during which "no law enforcement agency is to take adverse action against owners or operators of skill game devices in reliance upon this opinion," according to Saiber. On October 9, the court issued one-page orders, giving no reasons, that denied emergency petitions to extend the stay to February 10, 2027. Barley Snyder reports that three groups had petitioned: a bipartisan group of legislators; social clubs, veterans' posts, fraternal lodges and volunteer fire organizations; and Pace-O-Matic together with the Skill Games Business Consortium.
No legislative fix
Casino.org reports that no tax-and-regulate bill passed before the deadline. It notes that the Pennsylvania Constitution requires a bill to be considered on three separate days in each chamber, with no emergency exception. NBC10 reports that Gov. Josh Shapiro proposed a 52% tax, while Senate Republican leaders supported a rate of about 35%.
Scale and penalties
About 70,000 machines were operating in Pennsylvania before the ruling, according to an estimate Casino.org attributes to the Attorney General's office. After the ruling, Pace-O-Matic said, as reported by CBS Philadelphia, that "more than 10,000 Pennsylvania small businesses and fraternal clubs" would become "the real victims." That figure is the company's claim. MacDonald Illig summarizes a Section 5513 violation as a first-degree misdemeanor carrying up to five years in prison and fines up to $10,000. Pennsylvania has seized machines before: the Pennsylvania Capital-Star reported in May 2025 that the Attorney General's office seized more than 400 devices disguised as skill games in March raids in western Pennsylvania, and found $175,000 in cash at a warehouse in Homestead.
The Texas angle
Pennsylvania's ruling rests on Pennsylvania statutes and does not decide anything in Texas. A Texas attorney general opinion reported in June uses similar reasoning, however. Opinion KP-0520 was requested by state Sen. Bob Hall and reported June 11, 2026, by Texas Scorecard. It concludes: "So long as chance plays any role in determining whether the player obtains something of value, the device satisfies the statutory definition." Texas Penal Code Section 47.01(4) defines a gambling device as one awarding value "determined solely or partially by chance, even though accompanied by some skill." Section 47.01(4)(B) excludes bona fide amusement devices that award only noncash merchandise prizes, toys or novelties worth no more than 10 times the cost of one play or $5, whichever is less. Possessing gambling devices under Section 47.06 is a Class A misdemeanor. Public Gaming Research Institute reports that the opinion follows Texas court rulings that favored skill machines, which has left local jurisdictions disputing how to enforce the law. An attorney general opinion is not a court ruling.
What operators can take from it
The PSP agreement terms are a sourced example of what a negotiated wind-down can look like: a full inventory of machines and locations, immediate disabling, rolling removal and regular reporting. As an editorial suggestion (not a legal requirement), operators in any state may want to know where every machine sits and what their vendor contracts say about removal costs and liability. Tucker Arensberg advised Pennsylvania businesses to review vendor agreements for indemnification clauses and to keep records of cash and receipts. Our vendor comparison checklist is a way to record contract questions and evidence. It does not establish legal approval.
What to watch
Things to watch next: whether PSP releases seizure figures, whether it names the operators that signed agreements or announces more agreements, and whether pending Pennsylvania skill-game legislation moves.
Related reading
-
Do Skill Game Trade Associations Actually Protect Operators?
-
Skill Game Industry News 2026: Texas and Pennsylvania Developments to Watch Heading Into Q4
Sources
Reporting is for information, not legal advice. A vendor listing or the term skill game does not establish a machine's legality in any jurisdiction.
AI assistance was used in preparing this article. Consult primary sources and qualified counsel for legal decisions.